Re: Plans for 2.8 - GNOME Managed Language Services?
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: Mike Kestner <mkestner ximian com>
- Cc: Mark Howard <mh debian org>, Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>, "desktop-devel-list gnome org" <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, "language-bindings gnome org" <language-bindings gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Plans for 2.8 - GNOME Managed Language Services?
- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:39:48 -0500
On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 14:35, Mike Kestner wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 13:19, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> > Right now I think some people are arguing to block Java in favor of Mono
> > or sticking to C/C++/Python
>
> Actually, I think the argument is to allow java via mono, not to block
> java in favor of mono. Maybe you meant jvm, though. JVM is the
> technology that would block us from using other choices.
JVM vs. Mono runtime is the accurate way to put it, fair enough.
A partially orthogonal question is the class library set - Classpath,
etc.
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]