Re: Plans for 2.8 - GNOME Managed Language Services?
- From: jamie <jamiemcc blueyonder co uk>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Mark Howard <mh debian org>, Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>, GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, "language-bindings gnome org" <language-bindings gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Plans for 2.8 - GNOME Managed Language Services?
- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 19:51:07 +0000
On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 19:19, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 12:18, Mark Howard wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 05:48:32PM +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 16:55, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > > > My suggestion if we want to do something in 2.8 and we can't get people
> > > > behind "open source Java subset" is:
> >
> > What makes you think that?
>
> I didn't say we couldn't get people behind it, just "if we can't..."
>
> Right now I think some people are arguing to block Java in favor of Mono
> or sticking to C/C++/Python, it's a question of whether we can build
> consensus around one of these answers or not.
There are plans underway to port Java onto Mono (probably using one of
the free java VMs as a starting point). That should hopefully keep most
people happy and be in keeping with GNOME's support for multiple
languages.
jamie.
>
> Havoc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
>
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]