Re: PROPOSAL: GNOME Volume Manager for GNOME 2.8
- From: Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Mike Hearn <mike navi cx>, "desktop-devel-list gnome org" <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: GNOME Volume Manager for GNOME 2.8
- Date: 09 Jun 2004 11:42:08 +0200
On Tue, 2004-06-08 at 21:18, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-06-08 at 14:04, Mike Hearn wrote:
> > On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 21:51:43 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > > Secondary whine - we could benefit from getting the footprint of the
> > > desktop down. I wonder if reducing the number of separate processes
> > > (applets, daemons, etc.) is one element of that.
> >
> > Is there any evidence this would noticeably improve things? On Linux at
> > any rate the overhead of a process vs inproc component isn't really that
> > large. You lose if you are doing RPCs to it obviously but just for sitting
> > around waiting for events I doubt it's a big problem, especially if they
> > were moved to be loaded *after* the main desktop UI is loaded.
>
> Nah, we don't have good profiles. There is definitely per-process
> overhead in the library stack though (1M heap at least, and some startup
> IO and CPU).
Not for a daemon i hope! those should use less of the library stack.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
alexl redhat com alla lysator liu se
He's a benighted umbrella-wielding photographer with a passion for fast cars.
She's a high-kicking hip-hop soap star with someone else's memories. They
fight crime!
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]