Re: [Utopia] Re: Next stop Utopia, full steam ahead?

[Robert Love <rml ximian com>]

On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 23:30 +0200, David Zeuthen wrote:

> Right. I think that proposing g-v-m is a good thing then. I suppose the
> way to go about HAL is to just use it when it's there much the same way
> that FAM is used if available. If it's not there, g-v-m simply won't be
> built. If this happens I'll make sure to have a stable/unstable branch
> of HAL in any case. 

Great!

> One thing about HAL is that users want to get it from their OS vendor as
> 'some assembly is required' e.g. fstab integration to name one :-). It
> would be difficult to distribute with GARNOME or jhbuild as the HAL
> daemon runs as root.

Hrm, good point.

	Robert Love