On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 16:58 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 11:56 +0800, James Henstridge wrote: > > On 2/06/2004 7:26 PM, Andrew Sobala wrote: > > > > >Maybe. > > > > > >Obviously it would need happiness from the evo hackers, but I seem to > > >remember seeing happiness when we discussed it last time. But it does > > >require fiddling with bugzilla a bit, because we don't want to do > > >anything stupid like lose attachments (*cough* eazel *cough*). > > > > > >It would be nice. Maybe I'll see what would need to be done this summer. > > > > > > > > More importantly, it would be important for relationships between bugs > > to be maintained. Ideally, the text of bug reports should be edited too > > (since people often put things like "see bug 12345" in comments, and it > > would be nice if they pointed at the right bug report). > > Let alone all the many such references in the many ChangeLog's :( and the source code :-( Jeff > > > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. fejj ximian com - www.novell.com
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature