Re: GTK+ (Was: Evolution 2.0 and GNOME 2.6)

From: Archit Baweja <bighead users sourceforge net>
To: Sayamindu Dasgupta <sayamindu clai net>
Cc: Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com>, Eugenia Loli-Queru <eloli hotmail com>, Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
Subject: Re: GTK+ (Was: Evolution 2.0 and GNOME 2.6)
Date: 02 Feb 2004 10:52:50 -0500

Hey


Sayamindu Dasgupta <sayamindu clai net> writes:

> I agree with Miguel.
> I am running both KDE (3.2 branch) and GNOME (HEAD) - and I feel KDE
> (especially Konqueror as a browser) to be slower in many respects.
> The only part of GNOME that can be abominably slow is GEdit using syntax
> highlighting. I think some more work is needed there.

Tottally! Nautilus is much more faster than Konqueror... (atleast on my
RH systems)

Archit Baweja

References:
- Re: GTK+ (Was: Evolution 2.0 and GNOME 2.6)
  - From: Sayamindu Dasgupta

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]