Re: Why gnome-system-tools aren't included yet [Was: Re: new modulesconsensus]
- From: Jody Goldberg <jody gnome org>
- To: Mark McLoughlin <markmc redhat com>
- Cc: Desktop Devel <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- Subject: Re: Why gnome-system-tools aren't included yet [Was: Re: new modulesconsensus]
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 12:27:29 -0400
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 05:18:06PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 16:51, Murray Cumming wrote:
>
> > Excellent. So, I don't see any objections (even from Havoc) to having
> > users/groups and date/time in GNOME 2.8, if you change the defaults so
> > that only those ones are built. Mark, do you agree? Let's give Carlos the
> > go-ahead.
>
> As I already said, its not me that's making a decision - whoever has
> good reasoned opinions here should make those opinions heard. What
> worries me is that there are so few people voicing reasoned opinions
> here even though its an issue that has been hotly debated in the past.
>
> The only assumption you can draw from that is there's a general
> agreement now that adding g-s-t to the Desktop release is a good idea.
> So, unless anyone starts screaming very soon, then we should go with
> that.
I'm happy to see it go in. There are certainly areas that could be
improved, but having something in place seems like a reasonable
starting point for future work.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]