Re: new modules consensus

[Mark McLoughlin <markmc redhat com>]

Hi,

On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 15:28, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 14:06 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > 
> >  - libsoup
> >    gal
> >    gtkhtml
> >    evolution-data-server
> >    evolution
> >    evolution-exchange
> > 
> >      (No make sense to considering any of these independently, right?)
> 
> libsoup and e-d-s can be considered separately if need be. It would make
> sense due to the fact that the clock applet can use e-d-s.

	Last time around I was against doing this:

  http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2004-January/msg00499.html

	and I don't think the situation is much different now.

	Now, perhaps you could argue that evolution-webcal solves this problem
and I think it does up to a point. But it still doesn't make a huge
amount of sense (yet) to me to include evolution-data-server without
evolution itself.

Cheers,
Mark.