Re: Copyright assignment
- From: Sander Vesik <sander_traveling yahoo co uk>
- To: Elijah P Newren <newren math utah edu>, "Andreas J. Guelzow" <aguelzow taliesin ca>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Copyright assignment
- Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 20:53:23 +0100 (BST)
--- Elijah P Newren <newren math utah edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 07:11 -0600, Andreas J. Guelzow wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 02:55, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 14:09 -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
>
> > > > We want to keep the copyright for various reasons:
> > > > * We can relicense the code to someone on proprietary terms.
> > > > * It allows us to build proprietary features if we choose to.
> > >
> > > This two are reason enough for not wanting to take even a slight look at
> > > mono.
> >
> > In this whole discussion, this is surely the most important point.
>
> I disagree entirely. If you argue that we can't allow this, then you're
> also arguing that we can't allow a project that is under the BSD license
> (or MIT/X or similar) to be included in the Gnome D&DP--because such a
> project could also be made proprietary. I totally disagree with that
> stance. If you don't want to contribute to such a project, that's your
> choice, but I think it's totally unreasonable that BSD and MIT licensed
> projects should not be considered for inclusion in the Gnome desktop and
> platform. Besides, as Fernando pointed out, we do have a precedent for
> required copyright assignment (libart_lgpl).
With all due respect - but this is UTTER TOTAL CRACK. The situation between
a project that is based on BSD / MIT licence (like say libxml unless i'm
misremembering what Daniel did with the licencing situation) and a copyright
assignment giving a way for proprietary versions of code are entirely different.
Even more, wirth BSd licenced vs copyright assignment you get different "types"
od commercial spin-offs. There are many good and valid arguments both for against
allowing and disallowing copyright assigmnet but THIS is not one of them (besides
being wrong).
>
> Elijah
>
___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]