Re: Copyright assignment
- From: Rob Adams <readams readams net>
- To: Sander Vesik <sander_traveling yahoo co uk>
- Cc: Nat Friedman <nat novell com>, Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Copyright assignment
- Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 16:49:48 -0700
Note that this issue has previously (before the evolution proposal) been
discussed on foundation-list, in the context of putting together a
policy on copyright. This is the part of the copyright policy draft
that was put together at the time but never officially "blessed"
relating to copyright assignment:
http://readams.net/copyright/gnome-copyright/x68.html
On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 00:29 +0100, Sander Vesik wrote:
> --- Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org> wrote:
> > <quote who="Nat Friedman">
> >
> > > GNOME requires certain parts of the Mozilla project; Mozilla has required
> > > copyright assignment.
> > >
> > > So, there's no precedent in GNOME for denying inclusion to projects which
> > > are owned by non-GNOME parties or which ask that contributors assign
> > > copyright to a third non-GNOME party. In fact, precedent goes the other
> > > way on this issue.
> >
> > Note that there is a big difference between "required by dependency" and
> > "included in an official GNOME release", so there really is no precedent
> > here.
> >
> > That said, I can't see any serious problems with the copyright assignment
> > policies for Evolution. The only worrying thing for me is whether we turn
> > this into a general precedent for future modules. Let's forget the specifics
> > of Evolution for a moment, and consider the general case...
>
> In general, having say sign five legal letters to be able to hack on all parts of
> desktop would be rather limiting. So really, it would be nice if the general policy
> was that such assignment requirements are and contiunue to be very much
> unacceptable. Foundation getting its act together and offering a way to assign
> copyrights to itself would also help to remove problems with the single assignment
> related concern GNOME should be concewrned about, that is licencing integrity.
>
> Having a futuire written policy of "there is no copyright assignment needed or such
> will be assigned to the foundation" would be good.
>
> >
> > - Jeff
> >
> > --
> > What's all that about? http://www.no-name-yet.com/
> >
> > "There are men with an appetite for fight and a sense of occasion, and
> > then there is Waugh." - SMH, about Steve
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]