Re: making tarballs smaller
- From: Tino Meinen <a t meinen chello nl>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Cc: hp redhat com
- Subject: Re: making tarballs smaller
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 00:48:33 +0200
Ehm, make that Makefile.in.in instead of Makefile.in
I believe Jody added to this file a simple rm -f $(GMOFILES) command to
a maintainer-clean rule:
maintainer-clean: distclean
@echo "This command is intended for maintainers to use;"
@echo "it deletes files that may require special tools to rebuild."
rm -f $(GMOFILES)
Tino Meinen
Op vr 26-09-2003, om 00:35 schreef Tino Meinen:
> I guess there are several ways one can achieve this (I'm not a
> developer, only a translator), but the Makefile.in in directory: /po
> usually contains a line like:
>
> DISTFILES = ChangeLog Makefile.in.in POTFILES.in $(GETTEXT_PACKAGE).pot
> \
> $(POFILES) $(GMOFILES) $(SOURCES)
>
> If you remove the $(GMOFILES), then a make dist will produce a tarball
> without the .gmo files
>
> Tino Meinen
>
> Op vr 26-09-2003, om 00:17 schreef Havoc Pennington:
> > On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 17:45, Tino Meinen wrote:
> > > I'd like to propose to stop including .gmo files in released tarballs to
> > > make them smaller.
> > > These .gmo files are generated from .po files.
> > > I understood that until now, it was up to the developers to decide to
> > > include these files or not.
> >
> > As far as I know they just get included by automake, none of us are
> > doing anything special. How do you turn off including them?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]