Re: PATCH for 2.4.0: Correct default panel size
- From: Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
- To: Mark McLoughlin <mark skynet ie>
- Cc: sisob tuxfamily org, Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>, "desktop-devel-list gnome org" <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: PATCH for 2.4.0: Correct default panel size
- Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 08:24:20 +0100
On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 09:20, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 15:35, Mark Finlay wrote:
> > On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 03:33, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> > > <quote who="Loban A Rahman">
> > >
> > > > > It is also not even close to a serious bug. Why can't it wait until
> > > > > 2.4.1? We are past every freeze known to mankind and into
> > > > > release-candidate territory, during which time only show-stopper bugs
> > > > > should really be being fixed.
> > > >
> > > > Because, it is _very_ visible?
> > >
> > > And if it's wrong, or there are unexpected ramifications due to lack of
> > > testing, those will be extraordinarily visible. You don't change stuff like
> > > this between release candidate and final.
> >
> > Good point - I guess we'll just have to leave it that new users to 2.4.0
> > will have insanely large panels :/
>
> What I don't get about this whole thing is that if all the way through
> 2.3.x panel's are "insanely large" and the problem is "_very_ visible",
> why is this the *only* report I've heard of this ?
Because it's only a new-user problem, and most people were upgrading
from 2.2.x?
---
Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
McMurphy fell 12 stories, hitting the pavement like a paper bag filled
with vegetable soup.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]