Re: Gnome desktop files doesn't follow the freedesktop standards

["Seth Nickell" <seth gnome org>]

> Who decides on that set?  Aren't we aiming for Epiphany and Rhythmbox 
> to
> be "part of the OS"?  What substantially distinguishes Epiphany from
> "Image Viewer"?

Nothing. It should be "music player"

> What if gucharmap had originally had a "branded" name itself, like
> "CharacterWorld" or something?  Just because the author originally 
> chose
> a branded name, that means users should see it in the menu?

Yeah, that would be ridiculous. The missing line from the hig should 
say: "if you are writing a core gnome app, you should use a generic name 
even if that means renaming" (but at the time I was too timid to have 
the audacity to stipulate people had to rename their precious work)

-Seth