Re: libegg revisited
- From: Sean Middleditch <elanthis awesomeplay com>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: libegg revisited
- Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 20:31:26 -0400
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 20:24, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 06:38:44PM -0400, Jonathan Blandford wrote:
> > Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com> writes:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 17:56, Jonathan Blandford wrote:
> > > > Yeah. This is a serious problem. The biggest offenders here are
> > > > probably the EggStatusIcon and the recently-used files stuff.
> > >
> > > Tray icon is supposed to end up in GTK+. However, the implementation is
> > > broken, the API is probably broken, the spec is broken, and the UI is
> > > undefined.
> >
> > Then we shouldn't use it.
>
> Okay, suggestions for replacement welcome !
I would wager that the UI/use-cases need definition before a replacement
is designed. Most people still can't agree on what should and shouldn't
go in there. ~,^
>
> Daniel
--
Sean Middleditch <elanthis awesomeplay com>
AwesomePlay Productions, Inc.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]