Re: libegg revisited



On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 20:24, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 06:38:44PM -0400, Jonathan Blandford wrote:
> > Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com> writes:
> > 
> > > On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 17:56, Jonathan Blandford wrote:
> > > > Yeah.  This is a serious problem.  The biggest offenders here are
> > > > probably the EggStatusIcon and the recently-used files stuff.
> > > 
> > > Tray icon is supposed to end up in GTK+. However, the implementation is
> > > broken, the API is probably broken, the spec is broken, and the UI is
> > > undefined.
> > 
> > Then we shouldn't use it.
> 
>   Okay, suggestions for replacement welcome !

I would wager that the UI/use-cases need definition before a replacement
is designed.  Most people still can't agree on what should and shouldn't
go in there.  ~,^

> 
> Daniel
-- 
Sean Middleditch <elanthis awesomeplay com>
AwesomePlay Productions, Inc.




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]