Re: PROPOSAL: Evolution for GNOME 2.6



On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 21:03, Mark Finlay wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 20:08, Paolo Borelli wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 20:52, Mark Finlay wrote:
> > > > The chances are slim.  I'd been basing our tarball releases on the
> > > > http://www.gnome.org/start/2.5/ milestones starting with 2.5.1. 
> > > > Basically we were going to start tarballing 1 week before the due date,
> > > > see http://www.gnome.org/projects/evolution/map.shtml.
> > > 
> > > For those of us who build out of cvs, a quick description of which
> > > modules and which branches are needed would be great. Time is moving on
> > > and this big an addition would really want to see some testing...
> > 
> > A really nice thing would be having it build nicely in jhbuild[1]
> 
> Yeah, I'm planning on adding it to jhbuild but I can't get it to build
> myself :/ gtkhtml head wants gal-2.0 but gal HEAD is gal-2.2

gtkhtml head wants gal-2.2 as far as I can see. You may want to look
closer at this :-)

-- 
Andrew Sobala <aes gnome org>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]