Re: My take on Totem and GStreamer
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- To: GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: My take on Totem and GStreamer
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 23:50:35 +1000
<quote who="Seth Nickell">
> Which is what most users are going to care about, as much as I think
> gstreamer is cool and awesome. Getting Xine to be shippable with distros
> sounds like a serious and potentially fatal hurdle
(Bastien has said that the Xine dudes are perfectly happy to split out the
patent-encumbered source into another module, so this should not be too
serious.)
> The nice thing about Totem is that if we ship Xine for 2.4, when we
> transition to Totem with gstreamer behind it for 2.6 nobody should notice
> (except hopefully that things are stronger, smarter, faster, better ;-)
Strongly agree.
> The only issue that I would be seriously concerned about is if shipping a
> Totem'd Xine will further hamper the surprisingly lethargic rate that
> gstreamer is acquiring plugins for "modern" video formats.
... and fully supporting error feedback, video/audio syncing, etc., etc.
This is the biggest reason why I'm iffy about shipping a xine-based Totem,
but we may end up having to consider it for 2.6 anyway.
And on my random commentary about Rhythmbox:
> > [1] Which, as it happens, I don't think should be in the desktop release
> > (I don't think music library management is a 'greatest common factor'
> > feature) but should be blessed in an official GNOME release of sorts.
>
> Rhythmbox isn't "music library management" software, its a music player,
> which is pretty basic functionality at this point. I think music playing,
> video playing, and making presentations are the most desired "tasks" not
> yet handled by GNOME (though of course, we're still waiting on stable
> GNOME2 ports of some even more important software like Gnumeric and
> AbiWord, so perhaps its not fair to say that these are currently covered).
I guess my disagreement stems from 'greatest common factor' issues. Simple
media playing is useful for lots of different kinds of users, but music
playing and organising may not be. Consider a locked down corporate desktop
environment... I think that the stuff we put into the Desktop release should
minimally satisfy the greatest common factor of our users. "Accessories sold
separately." ;-) Thus, I'm not sure that a music player and organiser fully
fits in.
Totally random musings though, and good stuff to discuss over a beer at
GUADEC, I'm sure. ;-)
- Jeff
--
GU4DEC: June 16th-18th in Dublin, Ireland http://www.guadec.org/
"I think it will be admitted by all that to have exploited so great a
scientific invention for the purpose and pursuit of entertainment
alone would have been a prostitution of its powers and an insult to
the character and intelligence of the people." - John Reith
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]