Re: Privatizing 'linc' ...

<quote who="Michael Meeks">

> The choice is leaving a slab of unmaintained cruft in the platform for
> some (marginal) compatibility benefit [ perhaps for a single release
> iteration ]

I think this is probably the best thing to do, given everyone's feedback
about linc (no one has answered the "is it *going* to be useful as a
platform network library in the future / with some work?" question yet).

Documenting it as deprecated for a single release, and removing it for the
next release if there's no "holy shit please don't do that" feedback would
be a good precedent, if it has to go.

- Jeff

-- 2004: Adelaide, Australia
  "A problem worthy of attack, proves its worth by fighting back." - Paul

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]