RE: 2.4 Proposed Modules - 2 weeks left
- From: Murray Cumming Comneon com
- To: julo altern org, biswapesh_chatterjee tcscal co in
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: RE: 2.4 Proposed Modules - 2 weeks left
- Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 12:30:36 +0200
> From: Julien Olivier [mailto:julo altern org]
> I have read lot of flamewars between emacs and vi but I never read any
> flamewar between gedit and any of them. Gedit is just a plain text
> editor. It doesn't have 10% of the functions emacs and vi have but it
> has 90% of the functions a text editor (by opposition to code editor)
> should have.
>
> If GNOME had to provide a _code_ editor, I would say that
> gedit is very
> bad choice (at least for the moment). But GNOME _desktop_
> doesn't really
> aim to provide a code editor, does it ?
You'll be pleased to hear that gedit now supports syntax-highlighting for
code. No, I don't think it's a good idea either.
Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]