On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 10:47, Sean Middleditch wrote: > On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 10:24, Bill Haneman wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 05:03, Luis Villa wrote: > > ... > > > Galeon clearly meets most of the standards of GEP 10- as you say, it > > > would be a marked improvement over Mozilla in most situations, > > > especially as we work to integrate the 'net and the desktop. > > > > FWIW, Moz 1.3+ represents a significant step forward in integration > > with GNOME-2. The most recent gtk+-2 builds I've seen have impressive > > GTK+, theme, font, and ATK integration, though it's not 100% there yet. > > > > I think Galeon/Epiphany are cool projects and don't intend anything > > negative about them, but I do think that the arguments in favor of > > having a GNOME-specific browser are less compelling nowadays. > > One thing that'll help is a common mime-type system among all > desktops/apps. That's probably the one thing that Galeon/Epiphany > really provide. ...er...Galeon doesn't quite provide that as it uses its own list and not GNOME's. FWIH, Epiphany *does* use GNOME's, but I have yet to get it to compile on my ba5dardized system. ;-) --Jason > > Aside from HIGyness. (Which is always cool...;-) > > > > > -Bill > > > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list -- Jason A. Pfeil pfeil 10East com Senior Open Systems Engineer http://www.10East.com 10East, Inc. (904)220-DOCS
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part