Re: RandR support in GNOME
- From: Jonathan Blandford <jrb redhat com>
- To: Mark McLoughlin <mark skynet ie>
- Cc: Sriram Ramkrishna <sri aracnet com>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: RandR support in GNOME
- Date: 10 Mar 2003 15:49:52 -0500
Mark McLoughlin <mark skynet ie> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 08:22, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
> > By chance, will RandR be fully supported by 2.4 release?
> >
> > By RandR support I mean a capplet in Control Center that will
> > actually allow you to change the resolution. I think this would
> > be a nice feature and probably not very difficult to be able to
> > include in 2.4 (just a guess, I don't know how RandR extension
> > actually works)
>
> Yes, if someone writes it :-)
Anders wrote most of a dialog to do this, and it could prolly be gotten
into CVS. Also, the 'xrandr' command works well too. I had two
issues with it:
* It's not clear to me where best to store this value. It can be
stored in GConf, but it seems to be a per-display value more than
anything. It clearly doesn't make sense w/ a multi-HEAD setup.
* What's the life-cycle of the setting? Per session? If I log out and
log back in, should g-s-d reset it? What if I log into a different
machine?
Mark, how do you plan to have the panel handle different resolutions
in the future?
> > In GNOME I know that we have partially implemented this but I
> > don't know what that means. Does that mean that if you change
> > the resolution that apps "get it"? Does GTK have an API for
> > doing RandR already?
>
> GTK+ 2.2 introduced the "size_changed" signal on GdkScreen which the
> panel (and Nautilus) reacts to by re-sizing. So yes, the apps that need
> to, "get it".
Unfortunately, some of the randr-aware apps sometimes get stuck at the
wrong size. Xrandr support will definitely need some debugging.
Thanks,
-Jonathan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]