Re: GEPs

[Frederic Crozat <fcrozat mandrakesoft com>]

Le mer 05/03/2003 à 05:40, Jeff Waugh a écrit :
> <quote who="Luis Villa">
> 
> > > There are zillions of things, really. List all the features in 2.2, or
> > > all the planned ones for 2.4, or for GTK 2.4.
> > 
> > Features for all of GNOME just can't work in a GEP, I don't think, not
> > unless a handful of people commit to implementing them across all modules
> > and the GEP serves mainly to codify what those people will be doing to
> > other people's modules.
> 
> I think Havoc means the 'changes to modules list' GEPs that were not done
> for 2.2 because everyone pretty much agreed anyway. Might be worth trying it
> out for 2.4.
> 
> > GEP4: versioning: officially still pending. Hasn't really happened
> > because the release team has not been driven to enforce it. Again,
> > endgame.
> 
> It's being casually followed by most modules though, without 'enforcement'.
> 
> I mean, we haven't had to eliminate anyone yet.

I must confess I s*cked a lot on managing this GEP.. I was away for a
long time after end of discussion period and it never came back on my
agenda :(( Maybe we should change it as "approved", since it is now used
by a lot of modules..

-- 
Frederic Crozat <fcrozat mandrakesoft com>
MandrakeSoft