Re: (dbus)

On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 15:46, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 03:03:52PM +0000, Bill Haneman wrote:
> > 
> > There's no point in arguing "takes too much code" if the code is already
> > implemented and bundled, unless you are arguing about memory footprint.
> > 
> > I for one don't want to deal with 'yet another IPC API' unless the wins
> > are a lot more obvious.
> > 
> The primary win is clear: standard IPC across Linux/UNIX desktops.  If
> we think ORBit can play that role, someone has to go convince KDE.

If this really will replace DCOP (or even MCOP) then I agree this is a
big win.  Otherwise, I'm not sold yet.


> Havoc
Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]