Re: desktop-devel-list digest, Vol 1 #1099 - 13 msgs

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 03:03:52PM +0000, Bill Haneman wrote:
> 
> There's no point in arguing "takes too much code" if the code is already
> implemented and bundled, unless you are arguing about memory footprint.
> 
> I for one don't want to deal with 'yet another IPC API' unless the wins
> are a lot more obvious.
> 

The primary win is clear: standard IPC across Linux/UNIX desktops.  If
we think ORBit can play that role, someone has to go convince KDE.

Havoc