Re: Announcing the GNOME 2.2.0 Desktop and Developer Platform



Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 17:17, Sander Vesik wrote:

Jeff Waugh wrote:

<quote who="Laurent Vivier">

In the release note of 2.2.0, GNOME 2.2.0 Installation Order, we can read
that gnome-common is needed, but it is not in sources.

Where is the problem ?


gnome-common is not required at all, it's a mistake in the release notes.


This is not true - neither gnome-2.2 nor gnome HEAD is buildable without gnome-autogen.sh which comes from gnome-common. At least not from CVS.


released tarballs shouldn't need that gnome-autogen.sh.


Its not a terribly useful list (and one not reusable for the stable branches) if it is only meant to be for tarballs

cheers




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]