Re: Announcing the GNOME 2.2.0 Desktop and Developer Platform

Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 17:17, Sander Vesik wrote:

Jeff Waugh wrote:

<quote who="Laurent Vivier">

In the release note of 2.2.0, GNOME 2.2.0 Installation Order, we can read
that gnome-common is needed, but it is not in sources.

Where is the problem ?

gnome-common is not required at all, it's a mistake in the release notes.

This is not true - neither gnome-2.2 nor gnome HEAD is buildable without which comes from gnome-common. At least not from CVS.

released tarballs shouldn't need that

Its not a terribly useful list (and one not reusable for the stable branches) if it is only meant to be for tarballs


Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]