On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 18:47, Lee Braiden wrote: > On Tuesday 30 Dec 2003 6:27 pm, Andrew Sobala wrote: > > Also, we don't worry about bugs so much when they have patches. If the > > patch is going stale or the bug particularly nasty we might moan > > Wouldn't it make sense to give patches a higher priority? I mean, if they > alter the code to fix some problem, you have merging issues there, etc, too. > People may continue developing against old code etc. Does it make sense to > continue working on new features, or even documentation with patches queued > that could possibly change it all? No more than it makes sense to leave > problems unfixed, imho. > > Maybe this just needs to be taken a little bit more seriously... to me, it > sounds analogous the typical problems of getting documentation done. > > > Disclaimer: I don't know what I'm talking about here... just asking :D "We", above, == "The bugsquad". Sorry... -- Andrew Sobala <aes gnome org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part