Re: PATCH keyword, again
- From: Jody Goldberg <jody gnome org>
- To: Lee Braiden <jel ntlworld com>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: PATCH keyword, again
- Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:37:19 -0500
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 06:47:49PM +0000, Lee Braiden wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 Dec 2003 6:27 pm, Andrew Sobala wrote:
> > Also, we don't worry about bugs so much when they have patches. If the
> > patch is going stale or the bug particularly nasty we might moan
>
> Wouldn't it make sense to give patches a higher priority? I mean, if they
> alter the code to fix some problem, you have merging issues there, etc, too.
> People may continue developing against old code etc. Does it make sense to
> continue working on new features, or even documentation with patches queued
> that could possibly change it all? No more than it makes sense to leave
> problems unfixed, imho.
>
> Maybe this just needs to be taken a little bit more seriously... to me, it
> sounds analogous the typical problems of getting documentation done.
>
>
> Disclaimer: I don't know what I'm talking about here... just asking :D
I tend to prefer getting email summaries for patches. The control
center is jsut too damn ugly to look at it's bugzilla regularly.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]