Re: PATCH keyword, again
- From: Lee Braiden <jel ntlworld com>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: PATCH keyword, again
- Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:47:49 +0000
On Tuesday 30 Dec 2003 6:27 pm, Andrew Sobala wrote:
> Also, we don't worry about bugs so much when they have patches. If the
> patch is going stale or the bug particularly nasty we might moan
Wouldn't it make sense to give patches a higher priority? I mean, if they
alter the code to fix some problem, you have merging issues there, etc, too.
People may continue developing against old code etc. Does it make sense to
continue working on new features, or even documentation with patches queued
that could possibly change it all? No more than it makes sense to leave
problems unfixed, imho.
Maybe this just needs to be taken a little bit more seriously... to me, it
sounds analogous the typical problems of getting documentation done.
Disclaimer: I don't know what I'm talking about here... just asking :D
--
Lee.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]