Re: galculator should be included in Gnome
- From: Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik sun com>
- To: Rich Burridge <Rich Burridge sun com>
- Cc: wildfire progsoc uts edu au, simon floery gmx at, release-team gnome org, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: galculator should be included in Gnome
- Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 20:57:09 +0100 (BST)
On Sun, 27 Apr 2003, Rich Burridge wrote:
> > Secondly, galculator pays respect to arithmetic precedence. Doing 1+2*3 you
> get
> > 7 as the correct result in galculator (like gcalc), but gcalctool gives
> > you 9 (1+2=3, 3*3=9). In my opinion one can't demand the user to think about
> > arithmetic precedence and to resolve it with braces. Arithmetic precedence
> > handling is a first step towards "Typing something in as it's written on paper
> > should give the correct answer straight off".
>
> Good luck with this when you take it to your HCI person. calctool and
> sdtcalctool (gcalctool predecessors) have had a *lot* of HCI input and
> usability testing, and this functionality did not go well with them.
>
> Also you should consider comparing against the software calculator that
> probably most of the world is using - the one that comes with Windows.
> I just tried 1+2*3 there and it gives 9.
>
No. It does so only in the basic/standard mode. The scientific mode gets
it right.
Sander
Humans love to categorize and organize things. We break up time into
hours, days and years. Everything has to have a name, a history, an
understanding of it's origins and must be indexed somewhere on Google.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]