Re: galculator should be included in Gnome
- From: Anand Kumria <wildfire progsoc uts edu au>
- To: Rich Burridge <Rich Burridge Sun COM>
- Cc: simon floery gmx at, release-team gnome org, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: galculator should be included in Gnome
- Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 23:37:12 +1000
On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 06:08:31AM -0700, Rich Burridge wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> > Secondly, galculator pays respect to arithmetic precedence. Doing 1+2*3 you
> get
> > 7 as the correct result in galculator (like gcalc), but gcalctool gives
> > you 9 (1+2=3, 3*3=9). In my opinion one can't demand the user to think about
> > arithmetic precedence and to resolve it with braces. Arithmetic precedence
> > handling is a first step towards "Typing something in as it's written on paper
> > should give the correct answer straight off".
>
> Good luck with this when you take it to your HCI person. calctool and
> sdtcalctool (gcalctool predecessors) have had a *lot* of HCI input and
> usability testing, and this functionality did not go well with them.
Well, "textbook mode" / "formula entry" have been the norm for
calculators over here in .au for over 11 years. That is two full
high-school grads (6 years over here) of and approximatly 3 sets of
university graduates (average degree length is 4 years).
> Also you should consider comparing against the software calculator that
> probably most of the world is using - the one that comes with Windows.
> I just tried 1+2*3 there and it gives 9.
No, it doesn't. My version, Calculator 5.0 (Build 2195; Service Pack 3),
correctly outputs 7.
Regards,
Anand
--
`` We are shaped by our thoughts, we become what we think.
When the mind is pure, joy follows like a shadow that never
leaves. '' -- Buddha, The Dhammapada
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]