Re: [gst-devel] Totem or no Totem was Re: GNOME Development Series Snapshot 2.3.0: "Mighty Atom"
- From: "J. Gardner Biggs" <gardnerbiggs houston rr com>
- To: Jorn Baayen <jorn nl linux org>
- Cc: Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller <Uraeus linuxrising org>, Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>, GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, Gstreamer-Devel <gstreamer-devel lists sourceforge net>
- Subject: Re: [gst-devel] Totem or no Totem was Re: GNOME Development Series Snapshot 2.3.0: "Mighty Atom"
- Date: 12 Apr 2003 08:00:49 -0500
On Sat, 2003-04-12 at 07:22, Jorn Baayen wrote:
> Hi
>
> lör 2003-04-12 klockan 13.49 skrev Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller:
> [snip]
> > > > > (I hope that people will start using the BaconVideoWidget in their
> > > > > applications for playback, it would ease the port to GStreamer when it
> > > > > is done.)
> > > > Well we already have new projects using the gstplay widget which doesn't need
> > > > porting to GStreamer.
> > >
> > > Which ones ?
> > Lymric and GetControl are two. My basic point is why use a widget that needs porting when
> > there is one that doesn't.
>
> Some people actually want to watch movies.. my success rate with
> gst-player has been below 0 zero far, while with Totem I have been
> playing my movies for months now without any problems. Sure, GStreamer
> is the way to go, but it's not ready yet for mainstream use - there's
> really no denying there. Why can't everyone just use the same
> videowidget with both gst and xine backends, and then we can go with
> xine for the time being - since it Just Works - and set gstreamer as the
> default once it's done.
> 'but if we get no gstreamer users we get no bugreports' - well yeah but
> we dont ship a highly unstable gtk either do we, just 'because otherwise
> we'd get no bugreports'? Also gstreamer is not even working well for
> gnome hackers right now, if it's not even up to that level yet it's just
> not ready imho. Once it works well for us hackers I guess it's time to
> start considering it as the default, but until then.. I guess I'm
> sounding all negative here, but believe me, I find GStreamer a really
> cool and exciting project, I'm all for it, but we must face reality as
> well.
>
> And having two separete players targeting exactly the same featureset,
> exactly the same UI but different codebases - that's just pure crack,
> sorry. I mean what's the actual video widget code compared to the rest
> of the app.. not much..
>
> Ah well.. back to lurking.. just my 2 cents..
>
> Jorn
I am lurking here as well, but I gave up on all the gstreamer backend
apps months ago, like gst-player and rhythmbox. They just didn't work
well were too much of a PITA to setup and get working (if at all)
properly.
xine works, and can play just about anything. Just my two cents from a
user.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger
> for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and
> disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX
> and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
> _______________________________________________
> gstreamer-devel mailing list
> gstreamer-devel lists sourceforge net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gstreamer-devel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]