Re: pkg-config files & 2.2
- From: Jody Goldberg <jody gnome org>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: pkg-config files & 2.2
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 16:27:07 -0500
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:52:03AM -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Michael Meeks <michael ximian com> writes:
>
> > So the question is really; is it best to install 2 .pc files: a -2.0
> > and a -2.2 file ( both essentially the same ), or is it better to just
> > stick with the -2.0 file (perhaps misleadingly).
>
> The .pc filename version is basically just for parallel install, so if
> you haven't renamed the other files there's no point renaming the .pc
> file.
The core of the question seems to be 'Do we want 2.2 to be parallel
installable with 2.0' ? gnome-print is the only library that I've
seen thus far making incompatible changes from 2.0 to 2.2. For
everything else it is not clear we need it.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]