Re: smproxy

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Mark McLoughlin <mark skynet ie> writes: 
> 	If you want to dump WM_SAVE_YOURSELF support, then sure. But I
> don't see why we would do that since smproxy is quite trivial,
> completely self-contained and works ... Maybe taking it out of
> default.session and adding a FAQ 'How do I enable X11R5 support?'
> might be a good idea ...
> 

I don't mind it existing really, I just wouldn't spend time doing
things like caring about it. ;-)

Havoc