Re: smproxy

[Mark McLoughlin <mark skynet ie>]

Hi Havoc,

On 29 May 2002, Havoc Pennington wrote:

>
> James Henstridge <james daa com au> writes:
> > Anju wrote:
> >
> > >hi
> > >can anyone tell an application which smproxy handles?
> > >
> > I believe it is a proxy for applications that implement X11R5 session
> > management (which works through properties on the toplevel
> > windows). For most people, it probably doesn't do anything.
> >
>
> smproxy should be dumped, most likely.

	If you want to dump WM_SAVE_YOURSELF support, then sure. But I
don't see why we would do that since smproxy is quite trivial,
completely self-contained and works ... Maybe taking it out of
default.session and adding a FAQ 'How do I enable X11R5 support?'
might be a good idea ...

Good Luck,
Mark.