Re: Changing Yelp to use GtkHtml1 instead of GtkHtml2
- From: "D. D. Brierton" <darren dzr-web com>
- To: Mikael Hallendal <micke codefactory se>
- Cc: Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik Sun COM>, John Fleck <jfleck inkstain net>, Chris Lyttle <chris wilddev net>, GNOME Desktop Devel <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, GNOME Documentation list <gnome-doc-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Changing Yelp to use GtkHtml1 instead of GtkHtml2
- Date: 05 May 2002 03:44:39 +0100
On Sat, 2002-05-04 at 23:52, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
> And yes, I can see CSS have pros, BUT are those more important than the
> drawbacks (which I clearly listed) of using this solution. CAN it be
> done in any other way??
Look, I feel a bit guilty about butting into this when I haven't made a
contribution despite best intentions otherwise. (Explanation: no work to
speak of for past few months so far too worried about that to do
anything other than try to get some paid work; recently things have
picked up, so now too worried I might fuck up a tender and never work
again.)
BUT, as a web developer, I'm used to spitting stuff out in (X)HTML
Transitional that has just enough stuff in it too make it look
reasonable in non-CSS or broken-CSS browsers, whilst having style sheets
available for browsers that understand CSS properly. Couldn't the same
be done here? I *am* willing to help, but I kinda out of the loop at the
moment. Is there something I might be able to contribute to the
stylesheets side of things that would mean we could safely use either
GTKHTML1 or GTKHML2?
--
======================================================================
D. D. Brierton darren dzr-web com www.dzr-web.com
Trying is the first step before failure (Homer Simpson)
======================================================================
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]