Re: intltool rule patch
- From: James Henstridge <james daa com au>
- To: Jody Goldberg <jody gnome org>
- Cc: Kenneth Rohde Christiansen <kenneth diku dk>, jacob berkman <jacob ximian com>, Darin Adler <darin bentspoon com>, Kenneth Christiansen <kenneth gnu org>, desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: intltool rule patch
- Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 10:10:23 +0800
Jody Goldberg wrote:
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 02:24:20PM +0100, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen wrote:
Is this a platform issue? I dont quite understand what problem you run
into.
Please enlighten me.
On 2002.03.15 21:12 jacob berkman wrote:
from the make info pages:
Thus, a rule of the form
%.o : %.c ; command...
You were using rules of the form
%.o : %.c command...
This is not strictly correct for gmake.
Is it correct for any make? How does it tell whether command is a
dependency of the target or a command to build the target?
Also, I think the "%.foo: %.bar" syntax is not portable.
James.
--
Email: james daa com au
WWW: http://www.daa.com.au/~james/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]