Re: intltool rule patch
- From: Jody Goldberg <jody gnome org>
- To: James Henstridge <james daa com au>
- Cc: Kenneth Rohde Christiansen <kenneth diku dk>, jacob berkman <jacob ximian com>, Darin Adler <darin bentspoon com>, Kenneth Christiansen <kenneth gnu org>, desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: intltool rule patch
- Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 22:08:30 -0500
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 10:10:23AM +0800, James Henstridge wrote:
> >>> %.o : %.c ; command...
> >>>
> >
> >You were using rules of the form
> > %.o : %.c command...
> >
> >This is not strictly correct for gmake.
> >
> Is it correct for any make?
Not that I know of. But then again I don't know if any non-gmake
derived make supports the notion of rule and command on 1 line.
> How does it tell whether command is a
> dependency of the target or a command to build the target?
I have no idea.
> Also, I think the "%.foo: %.bar" syntax is not portable.
Older sys V makes only supported suffix rules
eg
.SUFFIX .foo .bar
.foo.bar :
cmd
However, most makes (that I know of) have support for gmake's % syntax
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]