Re: Galeon
- From: Luis Villa <louie ximian com>
- To: Mads Villadsen <maxx daimi au dk>
- Cc: Mikael Hallendal <micke codefactory se>, Paulo Schreiner <paulo bewnet com br>, GNOME Desktop Devel <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Galeon
- Date: 02 Mar 2002 17:38:27 -0500
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73142
If you have more details and/or solutions to the libnautilus problem,
please add them to that bug.
As for the gconf problem...
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71183
Any information you can add there would probably be appreciated, though
obviously havoc is the expert there.
Luis
On Sat, 2002-03-02 at 17:26, Mads Villadsen wrote:
> >>>>> "Mikael" == Mikael Hallendal <micke codefactory se> writes:
>
> Mikael> lör 2002-03-02 klockan 00.49 skrev Paulo Schreiner:
> >> Hi,
>
> Mikael> Hi!
>
> >> anyone knows why Galeon doesn't work on Gnome 2? I know it can't
> >> be ported to gnome 2 yet becouse MozEmbed isn't ported yet, but
> >> shouldn't it just run under the gnome2 desktop, using the old
> >> libs?
>
> Mikael> I think it's a problem with GConf, it seems to not like
> Mikael> finding GConf 2 instead of GConf 1 for some reason.
>
> Running galeon under gnome 2 (installed using garnome) I get the
> following output:
>
> /usr/bin/galeon-bin: relocation error:
> /home/maxx/garnome/lib/libnautilus.so.0: undefined symbol:
> TC_CORBA_string_struct
>
> This indicated to me that libnautilus has changed some interfaces or
> something, and that galeon was trying to use the new library instead
> of the old, since the new libraries come first in LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
>
> To get galeon running all I had to do was set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to
> nothing in a term, and run galeon from there.
>
> [maxx kabuki:~]$ echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> /home/maxx/garnome/lib:
> [maxx kabuki:~]$ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=
> [maxx kabuki:~]$ echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>
> [maxx kabuki:~]$ galeon
>
> And that just works. My situation might be a bit special, since I run
> the gnome 2 environment completely separate from the gnome 1
> evironment, but the correct solution to this would (I think) be to
> make sure the new nautilus install libnautilus with a new version,
> ie. libnautilus.so.1
>
> Can anyone tell me if that would actually work, and if it should be
> filed as a bug against nautilus?
>
> --
> Debugging is anticipated with distaste,
> performed with reluctance,
> and bragged about forever.
>
> --- Mads Villadsen
>
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]