Re: replace esound/audiofile with gstreamer

On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 14:56, Sander Vesik wrote:
> > now that gnome 2.0.0 got released and a lot of modules continue on
> > HEAD, doesn't it make sense to drop esound/audiofile in favour of
> > gstreamer ?
> not before its API / ABI stable or we are prepared to maintain a fork
> when they break either. 

wouldn't it make sense to fork a gstreamer version for the moment and
backport fixes to it so at least people can switch to gstreamer and
learn the api as is now. i doub't that a big api change will be hard to
modify in gnome. it is easier forking and getting help from gstreamer
people to maintain it than dealing with esound.

Name....: Ali Akcaagac
Status..: Student Of Computer & Economic Science
E-Mail..: mailto:ali akcaagac stud fh-wilhelmshaven de

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]