On Wed, 2002-01-16 at 18:28, Darin Adler wrote: > On 1/16/02 10:19 AM, "Glynn Foster" <glynn foster sun com> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2002-01-16 at 17:54, Darin Adler wrote: > >> Please tell me about the oddities, and I will sort them out. As I understand > >> it, gnome-terminal.glade.h is a generated file that should not be checked > >> into cvs, nor listed in POTFILES.in, nor included in any tarball. > > > > I was just copying what had been done before, as gnome-terminal.glade.h > > and others are already in gnome-core CVS. I only put them into > > POTFILES.in because I saw strings in them [in reality I have no clue > > about the i18n stuff]. I'll try and remove them from my local source and > > see what happens. > > OK. I looked into this further, and I guess I'm getting in over my head. It > looks like gnome-terminal.glade.h was generated by glade and was supposed to > be checked into cvs. > > So we have a conflict between glade's own scheme for localizing strings in > its files and the intltool support for glade. I have no idea how to resolve > this. I'd be happy to remove the intltool support for glade -- I didn't add No, no! intltool's way is the right way to do it. Glade's way of doing dates from the pre-libglade days, and isn't too nice. (ie. you need glade to generate the .h file which rules out hand-tweaked .glade files). > it and I've never used it. But we'll have to find someone who understands > this to resolve the problem. The .glade.h file should be removed, deleted and forgotten about. That's the right way to do it. Cheers -- /Bastien Nocera http://hadess.net
Attachment:
pgp7KvSCkkFA3.pgp
Description: PGP signature