On Sat, 2002-02-09 at 21:14, Bill Haneman wrote: > Miguel de Icaza wrote: > > > > That must be a very old plan, because GConf was part of the things thatI > > am sure we had discussed at GUADEC 2. Accessibility was the reason that > > Gtk 1.3 got delayed so much. > > Please explain this Miguel. To the best of my knowledge this statement > has absolutely no basis in fact. > > Our ATK work in particular was ready well before GTK+ actually froze. > We did some API tweaking later with absolutely no impact on anyone > except ourselves, but we most certainly did not contribute to the > GTK+ delays directly. If we indirectly contributed in some way I would > appreciate an explanation, otherwise I would like a retraction. > > Bear in mind that our accessibility work on GTK+ itself was > completed almost a full year ago, and that our implementation code > for ATK is entirely externalized in GAIL. gtk+ was already late a year ago. Look at the mail archives, and you'll see that it should have been released long ago. Just my 0.02 on the matter. Cheers -- /Bastien Nocera http://hadess.net
Attachment:
pgpt3uMVr8GVU.pgp
Description: PGP signature