Re: The NEW gnome-terminal!

On Sat, 2002-02-09 at 21:14, Bill Haneman wrote:
> Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> > 
> > That must be a very old plan, because GConf was part of the things thatI
> > am sure we had discussed at GUADEC 2.  Accessibility was the reason that
> > Gtk 1.3 got delayed so much.
> Please explain this Miguel.  To the best of my knowledge this statement
> has absolutely no basis in fact.
> Our ATK work in particular was ready well before GTK+ actually froze.
> We did some API tweaking later with absolutely no impact on anyone
> except ourselves, but we most certainly did not contribute to the 
> GTK+ delays directly.  If we indirectly contributed in some way I would
> appreciate an explanation, otherwise I would like a retraction.
> Bear in mind that our accessibility work on GTK+ itself was 
> completed almost a full year ago, and that our implementation code
> for ATK is entirely externalized in GAIL.

gtk+ was already late a year ago. Look at the mail archives, and you'll
see that it should have been released long ago.

Just my 0.02 on the matter.


/Bastien Nocera

Attachment: pgpt3uMVr8GVU.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]