Re: gnome-vfs usage of GConf vs threads - doh
- From: Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- To: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- Cc: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, <gnome-vfs-list gnome org>, <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: gnome-vfs usage of GConf vs threads - doh
- Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 04:58:31 -0500 (EST)
On 10 Dec 2002, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > With CORBA reentrancy there are no way to set up rules such that if you
> > follow them you avoid deadlocking when holding a lock over a CORBA call.
>
> But then again; thread per call sounds horribly expensive resource
> wise; hmm. Quite possibly a magic queueing API would be better.
I forgot to say this, but with the new Linux threading library being
implemented it will be a lot better. Thread spawning is just one syscall
(in the typical case), and taking a non-contended mutex requires only a
few instructions and no syscall. NPTL rocks your socks.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
alexl redhat com alla lysator liu se
He's an uncontrollable day-dreaming astronaut with a winning smile and a way
with the ladies. She's a time-travelling cigar-chomping politician with a
knack for trouble. They fight crime!
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]