Re: Application names in menus
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: snickell stanford edu
- Cc: Glynn Foster <glynn foster sun com>, Rafal Hajdacki <hajdi pf pl>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Application names in menus
- Date: 01 Aug 2002 12:47:30 -0400
snickell stanford edu writes:
>
> Where does the following "algorithm" break down?
>
On desktop files that contain weird stuff. Such as identical Name and
GenericName, or whatever. Also you need guidelines for e.g. when a
GenericName or Name should be omitted. In some cases I don't think
Name should be there:
GNOME Font Preferences Fonts
GNOME Mines Mine Game
yuck. There you just want one of Name/GenericName I think. Code breaks
if you have only GenericName though.
Also there are quite a few places that do this display (in GNOME and
in KDE) and they would all have to be changed - this is the main
reason we are "just using Name" in Red Hat right now I guess. It was
too hard to fix everything to use a new algorithm.
There are also some cases where the two part name is really long
and seems sort of redundant:
OpenOffice Impress Presentation Application
OpenOffice Writer Word Processor
Personally I think just "OpenOffice Writer" is better, for
example. i.e. only Name. But then for e.g. the Fonts capplet I wanted
only GenericName.
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]