Re: Beagle license change proposal from MIT/X11 to GPLv3

[Debajyoti Bera <dbera web gmail com>]

Hi Mirco,

> [please keep my CCed, I am not subscribed to dashboard-hackers (if thats a
> mailing list)]

oops... sorry. This was my first post
http://www.mail-archive.com/dashboard-hackers gnome org/msg04459.html

> The whole issue was/is solved with a SemWeb version that is GPLv2+
> licensed (beagle uses/used a CC-by-2.0 only version though).

So does that mean as long as we use a Semweb that is dual licensed, there is 
_nothing_else_ that we need to do ?

> Here a short copy/paste from the IRC
> 18:57:37 <meebey> http://www.apache.org/foundation/licence-FAQ.html#GPL
> 18:57:45 <meebey> SemWeb is GPL-2 or later
> 18:58:05 <meebey> so beagle as combined work: MIT + GPLv2+ + APL ->
> (becomes as combined work) GPLv3
> MIT being beagle itself
> GPLv2 being SemWeb
> APL being lucene.net

- dBera

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------
Debajyoti Bera @ http://dtecht.blogspot.com
beagle / KDE / Mandriva / Inspiron-1100