Re: Beagle ontology draft


Yeah, we thought about using Xesam at first. It is nice and everything,
but very exhausting to use and it's missing some of the nice features
that Beagle has - like note types, etc.

Our xesam-adaptor does a pretty good job at handling Xesam and now that
property names will be somewhat consistent adding a simple-tweakable XML
file mapping our ontology to Xesam's should be quite easy.

And if you are missing the nice features from Xesam ontology, nothing is
stopping you to add their equivalents into our ontology.


On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 20:57 +0100, Anders Rune Jensen wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2008 11:56 PM, Lukas Lipka <lukaslipka gmail com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Like many of you have probably already heard --- we are preparing an
> > event to fix-up all the property names (and other related things) in the
> > Beagle API.
> >
> > You can find more about info about this here:
> >
> >
> Why not use the names in the Xesam ontology?
> One good thing about reading the Xesam ontology is that it has thought
> of some interesting fields that will make applications using beagle
> better. Such as xesam:lastUsed.
> --
> Anders Rune Jensen
> _______________________________________________
> Dashboard-hackers mailing list
> Dashboard-hackers gnome org

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]