Re: Beagle ontology draft

["D Bera" <dbera web gmail com>]

> Just one comment: "im:buddyname" seems a little clumsy. How about
> "im:from"? Also, I'm not sure how this would work for chats (unless we
> index each line separately as was suggested).

IM data is a conversation between 2 or more persons (AIM, IRC, etc).
Does it make sense to store the name of one person as buddyname ?
Currently we dont distinguish between person-2-person chat and IRC
chat and I dont think it is possible to single out anyone particular
for buddyname in IRC chat. Instead we could store the list of speakers
(including or excluding self) taking part in the conversation
(im:speakers ?).

- dBera

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------
Debajyoti Bera @ http://dtecht.blogspot.com
beagle / KDE fan
Mandriva / Inspiron-1100 user