Re: WebBookmarks Queryable

On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 17:08 +0200, Jon Trowbridge wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 08:28 -0600, Chris Lahey wrote:
> > Why not just have the uri be ?  Why do you need
> > a separate uri scheme?
> Uris should be unique identifiers for hits.  If the bookmark uri was
>, it would conflict with the a web history item for
> Google's front page.

Why does that matter? It isn't really all that interesting whether
a url was found in your history or in your bookmarks, is it? you'd just
want one search result, right?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]