Re: WebBookmarks Queryable

[Martijn van Beers <martijn eekeek org>]

On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 17:08 +0200, Jon Trowbridge wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 08:28 -0600, Chris Lahey wrote:
> > Why not just have the uri be http://www.google.com ?  Why do you need
> > a separate uri scheme?
> 
> Uris should be unique identifiers for hits.  If the bookmark uri was
> http://www.google.com, it would conflict with the a web history item for
> Google's front page.

Why does that matter? It isn't really all that interesting whether
a url was found in your history or in your bookmarks, is it? you'd just
want one search result, right?


Martijn