[gegl] cosmetic
- From: Nicolas Robidoux <nrobidoux src gnome org>
- To: commits-list gnome org
- Cc:
- Subject: [gegl] cosmetic
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:41:44 +0000 (UTC)
commit 42d5030004bd606e0c227df9663e6b11414469d4
Author: Nicolas Robidoux <nrobidoux git gnome org>
Date: Thu Dec 13 13:41:41 2012 -0500
cosmetic
gegl/buffer/gegl-sampler-lohalo.c | 48 +++++++++++++++---------------------
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/gegl/buffer/gegl-sampler-lohalo.c b/gegl/buffer/gegl-sampler-lohalo.c
index ffa5892..5ba6d56 100644
--- a/gegl/buffer/gegl-sampler-lohalo.c
+++ b/gegl/buffer/gegl-sampler-lohalo.c
@@ -2271,15 +2271,13 @@ gegl_sampler_lohalo_get ( GeglSampler* restrict self,
*/
const gfloat theta = (gfloat) ( (gdouble) 1. / ellipse_f );
- if (
- ( x_0 - fudged_bounding_box_half_width < closest_left_1 )
+ if (( x_0 - fudged_bounding_box_half_width < closest_left_1 )
||
( x_0 + fudged_bounding_box_half_width > closest_rite_1 )
||
( y_0 - fudged_bounding_box_half_height < closest_top_1 )
||
- ( y_0 + fudged_bounding_box_half_height > closest_bot_1 )
- )
+ ( y_0 + fudged_bounding_box_half_height > closest_bot_1 ))
{
/*
* We most likely need higher mipmap level(s) because
@@ -2402,17 +2400,17 @@ gegl_sampler_lohalo_get ( GeglSampler* restrict self,
/*
* Update using mipmap level 1 values.
*/
- /*
- * Possible future improvement: When the ellipse is
- * slanted, one could avoid many pixel value loads and
- * operations with Anthony Thyssen's formulas for the
- * ellipse bounding parallelogram with horizontal top
- * and bottom. When both the magnification factors are
- * the same, or when there is no rotation, using these
- * formulas makes no difference. Reference:
- * ImageMagick resample.c. (This probably is not worth
- * it.)
- */
+ /*
+ * Possible future improvement: When the ellipse is
+ * slanted, one could avoid many pixel value loads and
+ * operations with Anthony Thyssen's formulas for the
+ * ellipse bounding parallelogram with horizontal top
+ * and bottom. When both the magnification factors are
+ * the same, or when there is no rotation, using these
+ * formulas makes no difference. Reference:
+ * ImageMagick resample.c. (This probably is not worth
+ * it.)
+ */
{
gint i;
for ( i = out_top_1; i <= in_top_1; i++ )
@@ -2506,19 +2504,13 @@ gegl_sampler_lohalo_get ( GeglSampler* restrict self,
:
(gfloat) ( ( LOHALO_OFFSET_1 + 1.5 ) );
- if (
- ( x_1 - fudged_bounding_box_half_width <
- closest_left_2 )
- ||
- ( x_1 + fudged_bounding_box_half_width >
- closest_rite_2 )
- ||
- ( y_1 - fudged_bounding_box_half_height <
- closest_top_2 )
- ||
- ( y_1 + fudged_bounding_box_half_height >
- closest_bot_2 )
- )
+ if (( x_1 - fudged_bounding_box_half_width < closest_left_2 )
+ ||
+ ( x_1 + fudged_bounding_box_half_width > closest_rite_2 )
+ ||
+ ( y_1 - fudged_bounding_box_half_height < closest_top_2 )
+ ||
+ ( y_1 + fudged_bounding_box_half_height > closest_bot_2 ))
{
/*
* We most likely need even higher mipmap
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]