On Mo, 2008-12-29 at 17:08 -0600, Ed Hurst wrote: > daniel g. siegel wrote: > > i would guess about 2.x or 3.x, but please have a look at the README > > file of each package, where the dependencies are stated. > > > > anyway, i am quite sure, that it wont work, as we fixed most of the bugs > > in the 2.22 and 2.24 branches. > > Nope. I checked with each version of your project all the way back to > 0.3, but none of them will let the build proceed, saying my stuff is too > old. I suppose I'm out of luck. hehe, well i wouldnt suggest to use 0.2 or 0.3 at all ;) so youre probably better of using a current linux system daniel > -- this mail was sent using 100% recycled electrons ================================================ daniel g. siegel <dgsiegel gmail com> http://home.cs.tum.edu/~siegel gnupg key id: 0x6EEC9E62 fingerprint: DE5B 1F64 9034 1FB6 E120 DE10 268D AFD5 6EEC 9E62 encrypted email preferred
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part