Re: other recording-format planned?



On So, 2008-03-23 at 21:20 +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 9:12 PM, daniel g. siegel <dgsiegel gmail com> wrote:
> > hey!
> >  On So, 2008-03-23 at 20:43 +0100, arph gmx net wrote:
> >  > Hello,
> >  >
> >  > it's a very pain to edit the videos recorded with cheese. Neither virtual-dub, avidemux, cinelerra,
> >  > Adobe Premiere or kdenlive can handle the files in the right way.
> >  yeah ;) gst-ogg is doing some crap sometimes.
> 
> Works for me.

i currently cant test the quality here as video recording is broken with
my cam (jaap help me ;) )

> 
> The problem is rather with Vorbis/Theora adoption.
> 
> >  > Are there plans that the format of the recorded video can be chosen before recording?
> >  we had some plans to do that, but after all we just used ogg as it was
> >  difficult to get that working on the cpu in realtime. i think we could
> >  have several formats, but does that really matter? or is it just because
> >  ogg doesnt work perfectly?
> 
> ogg is fine, I'd vote for a separate (dedicated) video conversion tool
> for GNOME. Also useful if you plan to put your files on some other
> devices (phones, PDAs, video consoles etc.)

would be an option too, as we are facing an export mechanism framework
in gnome

> 
-- 
this mail was sent using 100% recycled electrons
================================================
daniel g. siegel <dgsiegel gmail com>
http://home.cs.tum.edu/~siegel
gnupg key id: 0x6EEC9E62
fingerprint: DE5B 1F64 9034 1FB6 E120 DE10 268D AFD5 6EEC 9E62
encrypted email preferred

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]