On So, 2008-01-27 at 02:08 -0800, James Liggett wrote: > On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 14:49 +0100, daniel g. siegel wrote: > > thanks a lot for your patch! i tried it right now and you did a really > > nice work. > > > > just two things i saw: > > > > - it doesnt seem to work with videotestsrc, which is displayed when no > > camera is attached. we should probably add a workaround here > I'm looking into it...I can't believe I didn't try this :( ;) > > > > - the resolution chooser should probably go into the menu on the top > I'll work on this one after I figure out the videotestsrc > problem...should be an easy fix. > > > > i would really like to include this patch into gnome 2.22, so could you > > have a look at those two things and i will ask for a feature freeze > > break for that patch. > I'm glad you think this is that important--thanks a lot :-) > > > > could you open a bug in the bugzilla system and we go then from there? > > thanks! > Filed bug 512342: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=512342 thanks! > > > > > > > > I'm really not sure how we could solve this problem. I would say to try > > > threading it, but in my experience MT GTK is a *real* pain. Or should we > > > just cap recording resolution at say, 1024x768, as I saw was suggested > > > on Bugzilla someplace? > > > > > > > yeah, i think that would be the easiest way for now, as processing a > > video, which has a larger resolution than 800x600 _could_ be too much > > for a cpu > Should we consideer this a separate bug? as you like, but i think its easier to have just one freeze break daniel > > Thanks, > James > -- this mail was sent using 100% recycled electrons ================================================ daniel g. siegel <dgsiegel gmail com> http://home.cs.tum.edu/~siegel gnupg key id: 0x6EEC9E62 fingerprint: DE5B 1F64 9034 1FB6 E120 DE10 268D AFD5 6EEC 9E62 encrypted email preferred
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part